A1912 Risk perception and accidents at work – a study with petrol station workers in Southern Brazil

Tuesday, March 20, 2012: 16:20
Isla Mujeres 1 (Cancun Center)

Marta Regina Cezar-Vaz, Escola de Enfermagem-Laboratório de Estudo de Processos Socioambientais e Produção Coletiva de Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brazil
Clarice Alves Bonow, Escola de Enfermagem - Doutorado em Enfermagem, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brazil
Leticia Silveira Cardoso, Escola de Enfermagem - Doutorado em Enfermagem, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brazil
Laurelize Pereira Rocha, Escola de Enfermagem - Mestrado em Enfermagem, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brazil
Mara Regina Santos Da Silva, Escola de Enfermagem-Grupo de Estudo e Pesquisa em Família, Enfermagem e Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brazil
Handouts
  • MartaCezarVaz_Mexico.pdf (1.6 MB)
  • Introduction
    All around the world the human exposition to benzene is risky as it is seen as a public health problem. This study focuses on the exposition to it at petrol stations, specially by the workers filling up the cars. We aimed at identifying the workers’ risk perception and relate it to the time exposed to benzene and the self-referred occurrence of accidents at work by the workers. It aimed at the theoretical approach of risk perception.

    Methods
    Cross-sectional study with 221 workers from petrol stations in Southern Brazil, from October to December 2010. A structured interview concerning risk perception was conducted, the frequency of accidents due to exposition time. The time exposition variable was based on the weekly working hours exposed and on the time the worker serves as. Data was analyzed using the SPSS 19.0.

    Results
    The risk types mentioned were: chemical (93,7%); physical (88,2%); ergonomic (64,3%) and biological (62,4%). The risks self-referred were adjusted to exposition time, in which no difference was noticed. The accidents at work comprised 94,1% of the sample. The contact skin-fuel involved 25,2% followed by exposition to weather factors (18%) and fuel inhalation (14,1%). The accidents at work were adjusted to exposition time, in which there could be a difference (p=0,005).

    Discussion
    It is noticed that the risk perception exists by the workers and there is a trend to link it to accidents at work, as the work environment is dangerous. The study contributes to the occupational health policy, through the Benzene Permanent National Commission, intensifying the risk perception at the work environment as a complex social environmental phenomenon, as a preventive measure to occurrences of accidents at work.